![]() ![]() He has written thousands of articles, hundreds of tutorials, and dozens of reviews.īefore joining How-To Geek, Joe worked at XDA-Developers as Managing Editor and covered news from the Google ecosystem. Joe loves all things technology and is also an avid DIYer at heart. He has been covering Android and the rest of the Google ecosystem for years, reviewing devices, hosting podcasts, filming videos, and writing tutorials. Joe Fedewa has been writing about technology for over a decade. The outcome from both applications can be the same, but the way you get there is very different. That being said, you can export an Illustrator project as a JPG or PNG as well, which will merge everything into a flat raster image. Someone can open an SVG file and continue to tinker with the vector. A vector file maintains all the separate layers of shapes and text. An AI or SVG is the project file and the final product. Illustrator, on the other hand, is different. However, to get it to the final form of a raster image, it needs to be exported as a JPG or PNG. Someone else can open that PSD in Photoshop and continue the editing, and even undo some of the changes you've made. You can save a Photoshop project in progress, containing layers of images and text, as a PSD. Here's where things get a little complicated. Common vector file extensions are AI, EPS, and SVG. You likely already know the typical raster file extensions of JPG and PNG. Jason Cianfrone is a designer and developer at multi-award winning London based web design and online marketing agency Base Creative.As you might expect, raster and vector come with their own file formats as well. Used by: Designers, artists, illustrators, animators, publishers, film and video professionals.Popular tools: Pen, blend, warp, mesh, type, pathfinder, and masks.Used by: Designers, artists, photographers, film and video professionals, and illustrators. ![]() Popular tools: Brush, healing, type, clone stamp, blur, image adjustments and filters.What is the most important is that you make it your responsibility as a designer to know BOTH programs and know them well. Many designers will have a preference over which program they prefer to use but that should never come in the way of producing the best possible creation, whether in regards to usability or aesthetics. Knowing these programs well is going to ensure you choose the best program for the task and create the best possible output. Having a solid understanding of both Photoshop and Illustrator is essential for most designers, whether a web designer, graphic designer, fashion designer, illustrator or any other type of digital creative. There is no winner! While I've done my best to metaphorically create a competitive fight between the two programs, the bottom line is it all depends on what you're trying to create and how you work. The ability to easily resize, manipulate and reuse elements quickly is crucial when creating wireframes. Usually, a pen and paper is everyone's starting point but many digital creatives will just jump into a graphics editing program and start sketching in there.Įffectively you could do this in either program but for me, Illustrator is a lot quicker and easier to use for this task. This is the skeleton like blueprint in which almost all designed entities begin their lives. Illustrator is a lot easier to use to create wireframes quickly Quite often Illustrator is always a part of my workflow in designing UIs but most of the work is done in Photoshop. I wouldn't rule Illustrator out completely. If we're making considerations for our websites to be consistent across many different sizes, our websites’ graphics should surely follow suit.įor the most part, Photoshop is still the winner here, but only just. Also, as we're moving into a more responsive and agile web, we'll be seeing the need for resizable graphics more (ie. This not only speeds up your workflow but will also make your design more consistent. Using the symbols panel in Illustrator, you can create a library of icons and form elements that can be reused and manipulated many times over. Illustrator is also great for creating reusable components. Firstly, using Illustrator here makes the job a lot faster - there's the obvious resizing points. However, when designing user interfaces, Illustrator can provide many advantages that Photoshop cannot. As Photoshop graphics sit on a pixel based bitmap it would seem like the only choice for designing on screen media. As Photoshop graphics sit on a pixel based bitmap it seems the obvious choice for designing for screen mediaįor many designers (including myself) Photoshop is usually the first choice here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |